Thursday, May 14, 2009

Perjalanan Jauh 2009 (Perkara Menarik)

Wednesday, May 13

12:04 PM - Pretty stewardess tells me "I love your hat" and winks. (May or may not have winked since she was walking away, but that's beside the point since I'm happy to believe that.)
2:55 PM - Seorang budiman offered to trade seats untuk kemudahan aku.
3:18 PM - Kapal terbang taxi guna satu enjin.
5:08PM - Tukar ke waktu CET.
5:15 PM - Pertama kali rasa bahang Austin, TX.
5:39 PM - Bas 5:20PM baru sampai.
5:44 PM - Bangunan Capital Roofing Co. tiada bumbung. Sungguh ironik.
6:18 PM - "Tempat kitorang javang below 40," says Athira.
7:14 PM - "This store sells junk, which is basically what Austin is all about--". "Junk? Austin is all about Junk?" "TAK LAH! Austin is...unique." Athira defends her city.
7:45 PM - "Kucing ni Cina. Nama dia Xiao Yee. Tuan dia Cina," says Liyana about the friend's cat diorang tolong jaga.

Thursday, May 14

11:40 AM - Terserempak dengan Liyana and Amar at Which Wich? Hazwan later on joined us. I get the feeling ni makanan ruji diorang.
4:18 PM - Receptionist at Austin museum of art is seen opening a package containing a Family Guy Season 6 DVD box set. "Sweet!" he said.

Friday, May 15

1:26 PM - "You can't sign Kobe or LeBron to score three pointers for you. It's not like that. It's all your own effort if you wanna get into Jannah," said the imam at Nuaces Mosque, Austin during the Friday prayer sermon.

Sunday, May 17

6:35 PM - Three men talking at a bus stop outside San Antonio. "So, she must've been lonely when he was in jail?" asked one guy. "That's right, but I kept her celibate. Except with me hahahaha!" said another.

Monday, May 18

2:25 PM - Danial katok. We were the only non-White patrons at Mi Tierra.
3:51 PM - "They came from over here", says an old White guy to his grandchildren as he points to the African continent on a world map.
5:29 PM - Danial sees the first Jew in our time in Texas.

Tuesday, May 19

12:45 PM - We were the only non-White patrons of Schilo's
1:02 PM - Baru sedar mustard yang sedap gila contained beer.
2:04 PM - Dua orang pak cik tua guna internet at the library. Sorang layan Travian. Lagi sorang layan MySpace; he just added some 20-someting girl and was putting her top of his friend list.
2:52 PM - Pak guard cool at the Museo Americano Smithsonian who is a Vietnam Vet (MP) talks to us about being Muslim and coming from Malaysia as well as biotechnology.
3:35 PM - Pak guard lain yang muda tells us about CouchSurfing.com.
8:13 PM - Hispanic cashier talks to his Hispanic friend. His friend said "...but then there was talk about her bein' a stripper man. And I was like...whoa. And then she like, smacked me on my dong, man."

Wednesday, May 20

12:31 PM - Terserempak taik anjing kira-kira sejengkal panjang.
2:04 PM - "Hey, some women like that!" said a TSA officer as she checked bags going through the X-ray machine. "Oh, you mean spanking their asses like this?" asks another officer as he makes gestures.

Friday, May 8, 2009

KYS 2003: Prank Call II

A: Hello, boleh saya bercakap dengan Sahat bin Pungut.
B: Ohh, enggak bisa. Sahat udah keluar. Siapa di sana?
A: Hmm...Sahat tiada di sana, ya? Agak-agaknya bila dia akan pulang?
B: Saya rasa mungkin lewat malam. Dia di kedai, jaga meja. Siapa ni?
A: Saya DSP Yazid daripada Balai Polis Sungai Udang. Kami di sini perlu menyoal siasat Sahat. Dia boleh bantu penyelidikan kami dalam satu kes.
B: Polis? Kenapa dengan Sahat? Ada apa dengan Sahat? Apa dia buat? Apa yang Dato' mahu tanya Sahat? Saya boleh bantu juga!
A: Oh, tidak mengapa. Ini hal Sahat, bukan hal Encik.
B: Ini juga hal saya! Sahat itu anak saya!
A: Oh! Jadi Encik ni adalah....Encik Pungut?
B: Ya! Benar! Sahat itu anak saya, Dato'! Anak saya! Patutlah saya risaukan dia. Apa dia buat, Dato'?
A: Kalau begini, Encik Pungut mungkin boleh bantu kami. Tapi saya rasa saya tetap harus jumpa Sahat.
B: Apa dia, Encik? Apa-apa saja!
A: Saya ingin tanya Sahat, benar atau tidak dia anak Pungut.
B: YA! BENAR DATO'! DIA ANAK SAYA! DARI DIA KECIL SAYA BESARKAN DIA, DATO'!
A: Encik Pungut, bawak bertenang. Balik-balik, pihak kami harus juga dapatkan kepastian daripada Sahat. Kami perlukan sijil lahir atau surat sumpah; kami perlu bukti, bukan sekadar kata-kata saja.
B: Kenapa pula? Sahat memang anak saya, Dato'.
A: Saya hanya mahu cakap dengan Sahat. Hal ini antara pihak kami dengan dia. Kedai makan yang Encik cakap tu...ada nombor telefon tak?
B: Tak. Baru dipotong bulan lepas.
A: Tak mengapa. Saya akan telefon Sahat besok saja. Pesankan dia nantikan panggilan saya.
B: Baik, Dato'. Umm, Dato', adakah Sahat akan..?
A: Oh, tidak! Tiada apa-apa begitu. Seperti saya cakap tadi. Kami hanya mahu tahu dia anak Pungut atau tidak. Dia tak buat salah apa-apa.
B: DATO'! DATO' JANGAN NAK MAIN-MAIN DENGAN SAYA. JANGAN SAMPAI SAYA TELEFON POLIS NANTI!
A: Encik Pungut. Awak nak telefon polis? Awak nak buat apa pun? Datang je la Balai Polis Sungai Udang ni. Saya boss di sini pun.
B: Dato' jangan main-main dengan saya. Apa Dato' nak dengan anak saya? Apa Sahat buat?
A: Ahh, sudahlah kau.

KYS 2003: Prank Call

A: Hello, is this Hari? Hari Keresenan?
B: Yes, this is Hari. How may I help you?
A: Listen...I don't know how to explain this to you so I'll just say it. I come from a family of six brothers and sisters. Thirty years ago we were very, very poor. When my mother gave birth to the seventh child...we just couldn't cope anymore. She just had to give my baby brother away.
B: Why are you telling me this? Who-who are you? What's this about?
A: Shh! Let me finish first! Hari, we gave that child away--our flesh and blood. But we didn't plan on leaving him out of our lives. He was family. But his adopted family didn't like us...they were afraid he might turn his back on them. But they made a mistake, Hari.
B: And what does it have anything to do with me?
A: They let us name him.
B: And..? Who is this?
A: We named him Hari Keresenan. That baby...is you, Hari. You're the seventh child. You, Hari, are my brother.
B: What the fuck are you talking about?
A: I know it's a lot for you to take in, Hari. But I have proof.
B: @#%$^&*& $%%^&^*&*( %^&&**&(* **(*%$
A: Hari!
B: Don't you fucking joke with me! You think this is funny?
A: HARI! LISTEN TO ME! We--all six of us--are glad we tracked you down. I am your eldest brother, Hari Kemerdekaan. Brother... The rest of us--Hari Jadi, Hari Natal, Hari Raya, Hari Minggu--we're all so happy we found you.
B: *hangs up*

Tuesday, May 5, 2009

The OCD in Me Part II

I can never read or hear the phrase "every now and then" without singing--be it in my mind or aloud--"And every now and then I fall apart; And I need you now tonight (And I need you); And I need you more than evahh; And if you'll only hold me tight (if you'll only); We'll be holdin' on forever..."

Sometimes, I'll sambung sampai habis chorus.

Monday, May 4, 2009

Conversations

"Ooh, cuba rasa material skirt ni. Seronok gila en?"
"Um, ni nak buat interview and all that formal stuff kan? Tak rasa tebal ke?"
"You tak suka skirt tebal ke?"
"I kind of don't wear skirts, Dian."
- Shopping at Banana Republic, Prime Outlets Grove City

"Boy, sabar tu separuh daripada iman."
"Yang lagi separuh tu tak sabar la!"
- Aunty Noripah dengan anak kesayangannya

"Kenapa kau pecah telur macam tu?"
"Everybody cracks it that way."
"Eh, mana ada!"
"Habis tu kau pecahkan cemana?"
"Aku biasa pecahkan kat atas dia, macam ni..."
- NJ showing CatMan 822 how she breaks her eggs

"Honey, you should eat your breakfast."
"But I don't want to."
"Why not?"
"I just don't want to. And why do you keep telling me what to do? It's not like you're my mommy."
"Well, I am gonna be your mother soon."
"No, you can't be my mother soon. You can't give birth to me. I'm already born!"
"Now hold your horses young lady--"
"I don't have horses. And--and even if I did, I'd rather have ponies."
- Four year old girl arguing with her daddy's fiancée

Text message from NJ: Kau kat mana? Aku bosan gila, tgh bt bodoh kat bilik.
Purely coincidental text message from someone asking NJ's full name: Eh, NJ bt apa?
Reply: NJ bt bodoh.

Text message from Bozai to a friend: Ko nak main bola ak?
His reply: Ak taknak main bola ko.

Dian Hikmah says:
vatever
i anak dara alternative
Shazwan Azizan says:
ada kote gak?
Dian Hikmah says:
fuck u man

"It's not that I'm sexist. It's just that a lot of girls are such idiots."
- You know who you are

"You see three mirrors--your two side view mirrors and your rear view mirror. They make a golden triangle."
"Ohh, is that like the pubic triangle?"
"It's a pyramid, and at the top of the pyramid you see the all-seeing eye, En-Ra-Ha. Can you repeat that, please? En-Ra-Ha."
"Are you talking about the eye of Lucifer?"
"No."
"'Cause I don't know if I wanna look in there, thank you very much."
"It's not Lucifer. There are two fallen angels before Lucifer. There is En-Ra-Ha, Ra-Zi-El and Lucifer."
- Happy-Go-Lucky

"You shouldn't put diesel in a Ferrari."
- Harry Redknapp on players yang pecah

Friday, May 1, 2009

Religion, Happiness or Survival: Why I Chose To Go Katok


Two years ago I would have balked at you if you told me who I was today. But two years ago, things were very different: I wasn't living in Pittsburgh. I arrived here with the fresh hopes and optimism most of us had. In my mind I knew I'd stick to my beliefs with a passion; that I wouldn't easily be swayed by the weakness of others. I already had a pretty good track record in that for some reason (which to this day I myself can't understand), I've never puffed a cigarette despite most of my friends succumbing to the culture; I also don't quite fall for the supposed syok when you smoke after a meal. I was certain that the integrity in me would remain.

So it was that I survived my first semester in Carnegie Mellon sticking to the laws I was so often reminded of back in the Halal haven of Malaysia. It was quite an experience. I now know for sure that tuna tacos taste like shit; that I would rather fast than eat another vegetarian meal; that the vegan eatery here--Evgefstos--serves a million different kinds of shit that all taste the same; that too much greens will end up as seaweed-like complements to your feces; that fish isn't really fresh when you're so far away from a decent seashore; that meat, when you had the chance to eat it, was tasty, tasty murder. I did get chicken and beef and sometimes mutton once in a while. Salem's Halal Meats is just a few blocks away and I had the common kitchen in Boss House. Also, every Friday the Islamic Center would sell set meals after prayers. But I was paying USD 5,000 a year on my meal plan, which gave me 22 meals plus $70 every two weeks and didn't rollover. And Carnegie Mellon food is really as bad as people say. And not Halal. Slowly, the stoicism in me was hacked away.

But then many who had previously stuck to the strict Halal rule had somehow found out it was okay to cut themselves some slack. Some cite the fact that Jews and Christians are Abrahamic religions (agama samawi) or 'people of the book' since their respective holy books are recognized by Islam. Some say Kosher is Halal and that "diorang sebut nama tuhan sebelum sembelih" without quite knowing what they're saying. Some cite the darurat rule; that Halal meat isn't found where they live, or is too costly or leceh to obtain. Some couldn't care less. And almost all would say "Islam tak bebankan umat". My beef (pun intended) with all these arguments--or to put it in other terms, why I don't buy them--is that:
  1. I fail to see how we could still consider Jews and Christians as people of the book. We Muslims believe their respective holy books have been altered, unlike ours. We also believe that God gave Jesus the Injil but the Christian bible(s) of today is (are) clearly written by man, with sections edited, unallowed or omitted by councils throughout the years. In fact, I'm under the impression that the Bible is more of Jesus' sunnah since it's a compilation of books about his life and his quotes, written by his disciples, unlike the Qur'an which we take as a narrative by God.
  2. Search Kashrut and Kosher--the Jewish term for their law and their Halal equivalent--and compare with Halal. People easily assume that since Kashrut rules for slaughtering animals are stricter than Halal rules, anything Kosher is Halal. Islam requires that the name of God be spoken before the slaughter of every animal, whereas Kashrut laws require only an umbrella blessing for a whole session, not every single animal: there in itself is a huge hole blown in many an argument for Kosher-Halal similarities.
  3. In terms of darurat, I could understand it if I was in a small town with absolutely no Halal meat. For one, I have Salem's, and any qualms I have is that I'm sick and tired of their only menu: briyani, curry and salad. But it was, I thought at first, better than nothing, and something to hold on to.

Salem's briyani was awesome the first time I ate it. I even thought "Hot damn! Four years of this? I can live with that". Even kids from Penn State drive three hours to get here just for nasi Salem. I, however, changed my mind after my third platter (in my second week here). But then my friends in other cities and towns with no source of Halal meat whatsoever cited the Qur'an and some sunnah they googled that's conveniently in their favor and voila! due to darurat, they're eating breakfast, lunch and dinner at Taco Bell, Q'doba and Wendy's. I have Salem's so is being in Pittsburgh considered darurat? Questionable. I mean, you can't expect people to live off rich curries every day, can you? And if I was indeed under darurat, wouldn't that be like pilih kasih in the sense that the families here have to eat Halal since they can but I'm allowed some lee-way since I'm living alone on campus? And it was odd that in a place where no Halal butcher was present, darurat could stand. But in Pittsburgh where it's quite rare, darurat doesn't stand. Does this also mean that if I open up a Halal hot dog stand in one of those darurat towns, they'd all have to stop going katok and eat my hot dog only? Let's say katok is okay; what if I had a beef jerky in my pocket in Pittsburgh and I flew back to Malaysia? If location can render something okay or not okay, where are the limits and how do we set them?

I hate doubt so I decided no.

Then came the fateful winter break of 2008 in which I was stood up in New York City by my one and only mother. Yes, kecewa lagi, Ma. Anyway, I stayed for two weeks with a friend whose family ran the Islamic school I attended as a child. And the first day already she ordered pizza and wings from Domino's. Needless to say, it was very awkward for me to question her dietary justifications since, after all, it was her mother who has been telling me what is (religiously) right and wrong for so many years. But she's always been one of those anak mithalis whom everyone adores so I thought "what the fuck, taram je la, I'm on holiday anyway". I also thought of that rule where you don't turn down what your host offers you or something to that effect. Either way, they looked delicious.....and tasted even better.

She later on told me she abides by the 'people of the book' thing. I took that at face value, and did not argue. Later on when I called my mother, she told me to just eat and be happy and stop complaining about susah nak makan. She even cited a sunnah--something I'd argue with some of the above points if it was a peer on the other end of the line. Tapi tak baik derhaka. Easy way out? Guess so.

When I returned to Pittsburgh, I arrived on campus at 1:00 AM when only one place was still open: Si Señor. Extremely hungry, I tried their fabled chicken wings and until this day I am a fan. From that very first half-dozen chicken wing goreng tepung, life here has been somewhat lebih ceria.

I had a roommate who was a dirty, rude, unhygienic, selfish prick who farted at night because he's vegetarian and eats rice and beans every day. He also told everyone I was a charity case because I was under scholarship, unlike him who's a rich brat whose father pays the full USD 50,000 every year. My floor was mainly people who enjoyed playing Dungeons & Dragons and took a passionate interest in all the anime bullshit, on top of anything remotely Japanese like ninjas and God knows whatever they call that martial art one of them practiced. Of the 24 who were on my floor, at least seven of them are the founding members of CMUs Atheists, Humanists and Agnostics. Every now and then in the lounge you'd hear them discuss or argue or dictate whether one is agnostic or an atheist or whether any of the current proof of Creation is actually legitimate. During our first night in that dorm, one girl came up to a few of us all sweaty, and dug a finger into her cleavage. She showed us the daki that had collected under her fingernail and commented on how she finds 'boob cheese' very interesting. Once, a girl told us of how she was very religious but just not on the sex part because she can't live without it. She went on to say that she's non-denominal--which was, in her description to me: "We believe in evolution and the Bible. So monkeys did evolve, and the first that was 100% human was Adam. It all makes sense that way. Oh, and we don't get baptized". Another person taught us of how evolution means we don't need to procreate anymore because "human vaginas are in front and not at the back, like on animals". So sex is just for pleasure and fun.

Some people I know elsewhere have said my failure of integrating with those closest to me is all down to my not opening up to them. It's easy for you idiots to say so when you're in a fucking kampung Melayu, rooming with people you've known and grown to love, sharing a car, splitting the cost, taking classes together, going places in your group. I don't have that advantage. And for the record, I hate the kampung Melayus in the huge universities. If there's one thing about Pittsburgh I'd never give up, that would be the small Malay society here: no drama, no ridiculous gossip. I loathed this city as a freshman. When things got even worse for me, lagi la benci. But I should think I've learnt what I like and don't like, and I now appreciate what I have here.

Also, Spring 2008 wasn't the best time in my life. January was a bitch. February worse. By March I could only sleep a few hours a night. April and May seemed to have a brighter outlook but then I just had to go to the stupid and pointless Midwest Games. Coupled with the inexplicably horrible grades of both semesters, I would rate the Happiness of my freshman year as 5 on a scale of 1-10. Every year has its ups and downs, but this was the first time I could say I was really, really agitated and out of my skin. Sometimes I'd check out ticket prices just to see if I could pack up my bags and go home ASAP.

My decision to ditch the strictness of old and actually eat--that has set the tone for my time here ever since. I'm not saying, "katoklah anda and you will smile". I apologize to my friends who think me a turncoat for being so headstrong on eating Halal back then. I can only assume that my defection to the Dark Side has left you somewhat disappointed in me. I am not writing this to make excuses for myself. I know it is wrong. And I know I'm probably weak for not sticking to my guns. I'm just saying that in my case, it made my time here a little more bearable.

Initially, whenever I eat anything katok I get scared for a bit. I'd feel a pang of guilt whenever I eat not-exactly-Halal meat (I can't say non-Halal now, can I? There still is a bit of denial in me). My fear sprang from the fact that it all tastes just the same--you won't die if it isn't slaughtered the correct way; saying God's name won't magically/miraculously alter the meat; blood drained or not, sama je. I will still stay away from alcohol, pork, benda dua alam or anything else that we wouldn't eat back in Malaysia. The fear and guilt in me is proof I know that although it's the same damn thing to our taste buds, someone up there knows it's not. It used to bother me so, this guilt. But now that I have accepted my situation, I'm just happy that at least I'm aware of what's right and what's wrong. Yes, I may be in the wrong and you can say that I can live without it and you can cite the others here who are just fine. But this is one area I'm willing to be selfish and sacrifice piety for happiness.

For those of you who stick to the right rules and all that, I only have one word for you: respect. I hope none of you are offended by my personal choices. And I hope you never have to see me eating non-Halal meat (fine) or its by-products if you deem that insensitive.

Live. And let live.

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Jeremy Clarkson Agrees With Me (Somewhat)

I am sure many have been offended by my previous article, but my boyhood hero, Jeremy Clarkson actually agrees. Here I quote from his piece on the Alfa Romeo MiTo in his column in The Times.

"For some time now I’ve been on the hunt for a new one but the choice is tricky. I couldn’t have a Breitling because I don’t own an Audi. I couldn’t have a Calvin Klein because they are pants, I couldn’t have a Gucci because I’m not a footballist’s wife, I couldn’t have a TW Steel because my wrist isn’t big enough to sport something that can be seen from space, I couldn’t have a Tissot because I’m not eight and the only thing in the world worse than a fake Rolex is a real one."

Obviously you who take offense would think 'Aha! He hates Rolexes; the very brand you kiss-ass'. No. I only like that one model because it looks that way. It's not a brand thing. It's a look thing. It's like liking aviators; you don't care if they're Ray Ban or not, just as long as they look like fucking aviators. Rolexes these days...have too much gold and diamonds and bling. Hence Clarkson's utter dislike.

"And then one day, in Hong Kong, I saw it. A new Omega. It’s called the Railmaster and it is a thing of unparalleled beauty. There is no button that owners think will call for help if they find themselves in a crashing helicopter on Kilimanjaro, it is not waterproof to 8,000 metres, there is no stopwatch, there is no swivelling bezel to tell you how much air you have left in your tanks and you even have to wind it up every morning or it will stop. Plainly this is a watch for the sedentary soul. The man with no hang glider or mini sub in his garage. I bought it in an instant."

And it is a beauty. I won't like it due to the leather strap. But google it and you'll see it really is as he says it. Oh, and you can't blame me for being too fussy about all the gadgetry on watches these days, now, can you?

As an aside, the Alfa Romeo MiTo is named so because it was designed in Milano (Milan) and built in Torino (Turin). In Series 12 Episode 5 of Top Gear, Jeremy asked "what if they designed it in Twickenham and built it in Attercliffe?"

Saturday, March 21, 2009

Second Hands That Don't Stop Are Just Weird

Wristwatches or clocks come in a gazillion varieties nowadays. So much so that they just piss me off. If you're one of those high society freaks who have to dress for every occasion (and breakfast, lunch, dinner, tea, strolls in the park, bedtime are all very, very different occasions) either just because or more commonly because of fashion reasons, then fine. But not everybody can afford thousand dollar pieces on their wrists, and not many have the 'culture' or the romance of old to spend enough money to buy a freaking Perodua Kancil for a grandfather clock that's not too stylish in their modern homes, and requires winding every so often.

I remember back in 2001 I wanted a new watch. It was hard. I go to shops knowing what I want. So I get in, take what I want, pay and get the hell outta there. We have the internet, we have catalogues; I don't see the point in standing around mannequins and racks and shelves for hours, feeling around and trying things out. I do, however believe in doing so for minutes at a time. Anyway, the point here is about watches. All I wanted was something simple.

You'd think it's easy, buying a watch. Not because we're choosy: there's an abundance of choice out there. But because it's personal. I had my strap adjusted the other day and the guy was very specific about every single detail. He said many people are very specific not just about what they like in a watch, but how they wear it--looseness of the strap, the size of the face relative to their wrists, etc. Which is true since the watch on our hand is the most personal item on our person after our phones and wallets. You don't leave home without those three. And for me, my left arm gets weird without it on me. I can't drive properly (it doesn't feel natural), when I run my armswings are awkward, and my hands just doesn't feel right when I put them in my pocket. A watch isn't just a timepiece. It's very much a part of us as it is a part of our everyday lives. Like underwear or bras--it's just wrong without 'em, despite their being purely human creations.

"I want something simple yet elegant, with maybe the date. But that's not such an issue". And how did that work out for me? I scoured the malls of KL, the shops of Mecca and Medina, and even three malls in Jakarta. All to no avail.

Did Tag Heuer offer any of that? No. They just have to have these stupid konon fancy crowns, and the face has to be carbon fibre like the McLaren Formula One cars they sponsor, and the hands just have to be neon orange or something ridiculous like that. And they'd have at least three dials. Patek Philippe have some pretty ones, but that's it: they're too pretty you'd look metrosexual in them. And then there's the small matter of the price, because, as they say: "You never actually own a Patek Philippe. You merely look after it for the next generation". Why, oh why, do we need power reserve indicators? It's not a car, in which an empty tank would be a huge problem. It's a watch. If it's low on power, the second hand can just skip a beat--move double the distance every other second--and you'd know you can head over to the drugstore and get new batteries. It's not the end of the world, and other people know the time too.

And then there's the stupid stopwatch feature. Of course so many are easily fooled. They think they're cool because they have a huge-ass watch on their stick-thin wrists that can be seen from a mile away, and it has five dials or buttons which you could press and the whole thing goes berzerk--second hand rotating counter clockwise, minute hand showing signs of a seizure. Why? If you really do need a stopwatch, why use an expensive Tag? Get a Casio--it's digital, and you can have your laps and splits. Why use something that's hard to read (the second hand in a tiny face here, the millisecond hand on a tinier face there...) when there are cheaper/better alternatives? Why even think of something as stupid as that at all? I thought Tag Heuer and friends catered for the rich who have a watch for every single damn thing they want to do. Why do you put a stopwatch on your expensive watches when you know people wont wear them when they jog or dive or swim? It's pointless yet demand is high, so why do people buy them?

The face of the watch is the most important feature. It's what you look at every time you want the time--which is probably around ten times a day. I still don't get why you need oval faces. For men, I mean. I understand women need them to match their jewelery sometimes it looks like a bracelet, and that's perfectly fine. The beauty of women is etched in their curves so it's only feminine if a watch looks less rounded. Not to say that women can't wear round-faced watches. But short hands and oval faces on men--not cool. Neither round, nor square faces--well then, you're neither here, nor there. Square faces? They look good if you're a character from 2001: A Space Odyssey, and it looks good...on some people. Some. The hands rotate in a circular motion; just leave the faces round for fuck's sake. And make 'em less gay, less poyo, less flashy.

Now we get to the strap. I should think all types of straps have their appeal. But nobody looks good in suit or tux if they wear anything plastic or Velcro or most digital watches for that matter. Sure there's a time and place for everything, but if you could choose something universal, what'd it be? A leather strap just isn't for me as of now. I don't quite have the luxury for a second or third watch, so I'd rather stick to one through thick and thin. And then there's also the small matter of leather/suede and its water- and smell-related issues. So, steel it is then. Have you seen the steel straps for men's watches these days? You look at them and they're just so gender-polarized. Either they're just slightly bigger than their women's counterparts, but still as feminine and still very gay to wear. Or they're just like tiny pieces of bricks, crudely-designed squares or rectangles with sharp edges. In the 1980's, cars were too squarish (e.g. Proton Saga), in the 1990's they were too round, making them look bulky (e.g. Mercedes Benz E-Class, W210). And then there are the fancy ones that think they got it right having a mix of both, with weirdo lines here and there making the watch look like it came from outer space. Just like any recent Pontiac--so rounded it looks like shit, and then you have these pointless lines here and there that make it worse. Now in the Naughties, we have an awesome blend of curves and lines and creases, resulting in the sexy new generation of Merc's and--off the top my head--the Cadillac CTS, any new Volkswagen or Audi, anything from Aston Martin, the new Dodge Charger. Just look at Merc's new GLK and the CLS; or the BMW X6, pointless as it is. Now those are pretty. And I'm not just gaga over the luxury brands: Kia, Honda Mazda and Ford are close behind. You don't want a buffed up 300 pound jock, nor do you want a wafer-thin wimp who exudes innocence and tenderness. You don't want something showy, with awkward motifs and shit. You'd want the James Bond of watches: he won't pack a mean punch, he doesn't come in and show his awesome biceps; yet he's no pushover, he's no "oh, I feel tho depreththed today I jutht need thome chocolate" (with a threthh on the 't' in 'chocolate'). Why can't straps be low-key, yet elegant?

People hate the what-the-fuck-is-that days of the Casio G Shock where straps are a mixture of Velcro and clips and god-knows-what and have rubber protectors for the glass. They hate the konon alternative-ness of the ring watch because you just need something on your wrist. They hate a lot of things. Yet they like the huge, bold and very crude offerings from Fossil because they think it makes them a manly man. They like anything from Tag because 1) it's a Tag and 2) they think the crown is 'pretty' and 3) it's got all these cool things it can do and it's got glow-in-the-dark neon orange hands and that F1 champ wears it. They like anything you think a pimp might want because they crave your attention. They'd get $10 Casios because they can't be bothered to learn to read analog watches (and it's waterproof and has a stopwatch, they'll insist). Geeks/nerds will want the remote control watch or the calculator watch because they think it's cool.

We hate lots of these things yet there is a group of people out there who treasure these items. I'd just love to rant about how hard it is for me to find something I like, but I guess it's the same for everyone since the poyo would have a problem due to the abundance of poyo-ness out there. Wherever you are on the spectrum, you're screwed anyway. As to where this is going, I have absolutely no idea. I saw an ad by Hublot and it had a watch that had a nonstop second hand, which prompted the title but now apparently I have digressed and written my opinion on the market for watches and to an extent, clocks. Well, in November 2003 I finally found something I like. It's titanium so it was light and didn't have that solid feel of something so personal and so valuable. But your hands and arms would 'learn' your watch, in time. That Seiko, though, in all its not-so-grandness, was the sleekest and prettiest of 'em all TO ME. I take issue with these kind/design of watches because not only are they so rare, they are usually extremely expensive. It isn't hard to design something without aesthetics. It's probably cheaper to make since it doesn't need spinning crowns and extra mechanisms for stupid stopwatches. Yet only the grandest brands make these kinds. It's like only the Rolls Royces and the Bentleys make 2.0 sedans and everyone else makes coupés and hot hatches. The 2.0 sedans will still be sedans and still be 2.0 but they'd be ridiculously expensive due to their fancy badge (and superior build quality, I should add). But this Seiko I found was an exception to the rule, so I bought it. My gift for 8As in PMR.

In recent months I have looked around online and in all my looking around, found only three I could agree upon. One is the Rolex Explorer. Before you pass judgment on such high taste on my part, google it and take a look for yourself. Not the Explorer II. But the original Explorer designed for members of Sir Edmund Hillary's climb up Everest in 1953. The fact that it was designed so long ago and still is in production goes to show what a timeless (pun intended) classic it is. Why Rolex just had to 'touch it up' with a white face and a silly rotatable crown, only God knows. But take a look at the Explorer and tell me it isn't the James Bond of watches. Okay, fine. Maybe it isn't exactly 007 due to the lack of gadgetry, but you know what I mean. Anyway, I can't have it even if I had a million dollars to burn: the dad has it, and that would lack originality. Or would it? (Maybe our preferences are indeed the same?) Then there was one each from Maurice Lacroix and Jaeger-LeCoultre. All three very similar, and priced between $1,300 and $5,000. Well? Well. Well at least I know what I want. It may be impossible to find a watch I like, much less get one, but that makes it all the more worth it. Which is why I love this Seiko, even if I could have had something more solid or 'classy' or 'of a higher stature' (or pricier, in short).

And on a side note, watches or clocks are synonymous to the tick-tocking of a timepiece. And they can only tick-tock if the second hand ticks one second and then tocks the next. So second hands that don't stop are just weird.

Friday, March 20, 2009

Patience, Second Chances & Letting Go


I gave it everything I had. I gave it a second chance. I put my trust and belief in it all this time. When others were saying 'to hell with it', I soldiered on, hoping that my faith would prove fruitful one day. And as they laugh at what they can't perceive, my loyalty went unquestioned. Until yesterday.

Sure it'd be easy to ditch something not entirely correct or effective or efficient for something that works like a dream. In fact, that's simple economics. A situation is inefficient if a change can be made in which at least one party will be better off, but none will be worse off. But just because something, some aspect of our lives is lacking--is inefficient--does that mean any change we do to correct it would render our life efficient?

Enough with the jargon-y bullshit.

I try my best to keep things simple; to not have third parties involved. Up till yesterday I used IE7 because I use Windows and would like everything as Microsoft as can be. I couldn't care less about speed. It loads just fine; a few milliseconds doesn't make that much difference. If it was lagging or reminiscent of the line-by-line days of dial-up, then that'd be a different story. Then there is that flash plug-in problem that crashes IE at least twice a day. This usually happens when I open a flash-heavy site like Facebook or Soccernet. Sometimes, new tabs just keep opening nonstop and I'd have to terminate IE using Task Manager. I haven't the slightest idea if that's the flash plug-in's fault or if it's just IE's stupid programming rearing its ugly head, but everything would be better if I had Firefox or Chrome or Safari.

So it was that yesterday I updated to Internet Explorer 8. Microsoft released it after months of beta testing and announced that it was faster than the others. And it (as have other Microsoft updates) rendered my sound card useless/undetectable. And my processor; all three cores. And some PCI controllers. And the monitor. I open Device Manager and there's an exclamation mark beside all of them; Error Code 37, can't load driver. How can you not load the driver for your processor?
And that was the last straw. Not only has IE been slower, it's buggier and takes up more memory, and now it fucks your system up. Now I'll have to reinstall Windows and we all know the effort and time that'll take.

And what's worse is that IE8 is supposed to be better than the rest. If Microsoft could be bold enough to claim it's the best one out there, they should put their money where their mouth is. But alas, we all have our limits. I have stayed true to my words and supported their proprietary browser/software ever since the early days of IE vs. Netscape. I only stopped using Windows Media Player because my dad gifted me an iPod. I did, though, give IE one last shot for old time's sake: I opened up Yahoo! Mail (YM tells me IE8 is optimized for Yahoo! but only with their freaking toolbar installed) in hopes of the "Set Y! Mail as default webmail" option (a fix that leads all "mailto" links straight to your webmail client). And how did that work out? I was disappointed yet again. Of the millions you put into the R&D, you can't spare a thought for the millions who use webmail.

So there it was that I ended my 13-year commitment to IE and jump ship to the only browser that stands out for me, Firefox, but only because it's the only one that can direct any "mailto" links straight to Yahoo! Mail.
Loyalty is rare these days. People outgrow everything so easily, as do these things outgrow us. You cannot expect people or computer programs or cars to be perfect or squeaky clean or everything you want/hope them to be. We all make mistakes, and we should, of course, expect others to fuck up every now and then. And we forgive them, pat them on the back and say "chin up" and smile so they wont feel bad. But if people have the grace to treat us that way once we let them down, responding by plunging ourselves into even deeper shit is just not cool. Loyalties always come bundled with a commitment--something, when made in our favor, is a measure of people's faith and trust in us. So why fuck them over when they duly defend you, when they are your confidantes?

Yes, I changed my mind. Many of you who have given me stick for being loyal to what I ultimately gave up would surely have a field day at my change of allegiance. But note this: I stayed true to my words, I gave it my all, I gave it a second chance, I stuck by it through thick and thin. I gave it up with the knowledge that this is an avenue I have truly exhausted. I have no doubts about my decision; none of those "what ifs" running through my head.

How many of you Firefox-obsessed assholes have jumped ship to Chrome or Safari at the behest of their perceived superiority or speed? How many of you who are literally in bed with a Firefox right now would jump ship if it merely started being as shit as you say IE is? Have a little sentimentality for something you believe in. That's what makes us human.

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

Pengaruh Rakan Sebaya (Ahmad Nazmi)

I have an exam in 4 hours but I guess breakfast isn't quite enough to get the study mood to kick in. And then I found this from Gokun so I decided to have a go. It's interesting (for me, at least) since it's an adventure-type quiz. Answers are pretty hit-and-miss but what the hell.

Your view on yourself: You are down-to-earth and people like you because you are so straightforward. You are an efficient problem solver because you will listen to both sides of an argument before making a decision that usually appeals to both parties.
YA! Saya agak tertarik dengan petikan ini.

The type of girlfriend/boyfriend you are looking for: You like serious, smart and determined people. You don't judge a book by its cover, so good-looking people aren't necessarily your style. This makes you an attractive person in many people's eyes.
Babi ah, baru je gelakkan Gokun...sekali tengok dapat sama. Cis.

Your readiness to commit to a relationship: You are ready to commit as soon as you meet the right person. And you believe you will pretty much know as soon as you meet that person.
*Tergamam*

The seriousness of your love: You are very serious about relationships and aren't interested in wasting time with people you don't really like. If you meet the right person, you will fall deeply and beautifully in love.
*Angguk bersetuju, namun sedikit takut akan ketepatannya*

Your views on education: Education is very important in life. You want to study hard and learn as much as you can.
Yang ini mungkin sedikit dusta.

The right job for you: You have plenty of dream jobs but have little chance of doing any of them if you don't focus on something in particular. You need to choose something and go for it to be happy and achieve success.
Tapi saya gemar berkhayal...

How do you view success: You are afraid of failure and scared to have a go at the career you would like to have in case you don't succeed. Don't give up when you haven't yet even started! Be courageous.
Jikalau ekonomi Malaysia jahanam (dalam 5-10 tahun akan datang), siapakah yang anda akan salahkan?

What are you most afraid of: You are afraid of having no one to rely on in times of trouble. You don't ever want to be unable to take care of yourself. Independence is important to you.
This is why I don't trust many people.

Who is your true self: You are mature, reasonable, honest and give good advice. People ask for your comments on all sorts of different issues. Sometimes you might find yourself in a dilemma when trapped with a problem, which your heart rather than your head needs to solve.
Ayat pertama itu agak membanggakan. Ayat kedua sudah kurang tepat kebelakangan ini. Ayat ketiga itu sangat tepat.